|
In
1999, at the height of the Internet bubble, Paul Sparta
set about raising venture capital for his company,
Plateau Systems. As a developer of “learning
management systems” software, the Arlington-based
company seemingly fit the sector profile that venture
capitalists were looking for. What’s more, Plateau had
signed up solid clients, including two Fortune 500
companies, operated at a profit, and projected that its
revenues would grow 100 percent per year for several
years running.
But
the venture capitalists weren’t interested. “People
were asking, ‘Why can’t you get to a
billion-and-a-half valuation in two years?’” says Sparta,
Plateau’s chairman and CEO. “We weren’t making
promises of all this growth. … Our plan wasn’t based
on bubble economics. We didn’t put something on
paper just to get the VCs juiced.”
It
was particularly galling to see competitors like Saba,
Click2Learn and Docent raise a combined $670 million
from venture funding and Initial Public Offerings. But in 2000 Sparta
finally did raise $18 million in financial backing
from untraditional venture sources, and Plateau went on to meet its goal of
doubling revenues for four years running. The company
may not be worth billions today, but it is worth a lot
more than the hundreds of dotcom marvels that have
since bit the dust – and it’s certainly been a
better investment than Saba, trading around $4 per
share, down from a high of $164, and the newly merged
SumTotal Systems (a combination of Click2Learn and
Docent), trading around $5 down from a pinnacle of $104.
The
experience was frustrating, but not altogether
unrewarding. By accepting a “slower” pace of growth
– one that anyone but a dotcom-era venture capitalist
would envy -- Plateau developed new business
organically. The company didn’t get ahead of the
market, ramping up sales and overhead expense for
business that never materialized. “If a market
develops at a certain rate,” Sparta
says, “you can’t make it grow any faster.”
With
revenues somewhere between $25 million to $40 million,
Plateau Systems now makes a plausible case for being the
leading player in the
emerging LMS (learning management systems) space. In an
March 2004 research report, Gartner Research displayed
Plateau as the
best positioned company in a scatter graph of two dozen
learning management system companies, as ranked by their vision and
ability to execute.
The
size of the LMS market is about $400 million a year
currently, Sparta
estimates, but as the Next Big Thing in enterprise
software applications, LMS should grow exponentially.
“Look at the value that enterprise software has
brought to business,” he says. “We manage supply
chains this way. We manage manufacturing this way, sales
this way, call centers this way.” The next frontier is
to use enterprise software to manage human capital, and
learning management systems should follow the same
growth curve as the others.
Plateau’s
enterprise software allows decision makers of large
organizations to systematically manage what Sparta
calls “knowledge readiness.” Organizations need to
know what their people know, identify what they need to know, and then deliver the knowledge to meet those needs.
Say, for example, a company wants to launch a new
product. A learning management system tells the top
brass if they possess the right people with the right
skills to undertake the roll out and, if not, what
skills employees need to acquire.
Or,
to take another example, say the Securities Exchange
Commission issues a regulatory change. An LMS automates
the process of collecting 5,000 read-and-understand
signatures. Whether it’s used for regulatory
compliance, project management or succession planning,
says
Sparta, a
learning management system “keeps track of the
totality of the knowledge of the individual and the
organization.”
Paul
Sparta served eight years in naval aviation before
leaving the U.S. Navy in 1988. He worked five years for
General Physics Corporation, a training services
company, and then moved to MRJ, a government contracting
firm serving the defense-intelligence community. Sparta
led the MRJ team that developed the first
iteration of Plateau’s enterprise software.
Commercial
software products require a very different corporate
organization and culture than the government contracting
business, however. MRJ spun off Plateau Systems in what Sparta
describes as “a friendly divorce.” At the time, he
says, the company focused narrowly on training
management. But as the possibilities of the Internet
became more apparent to all, top management saw a need
to evolve in a more “holistic” direction.
Plateau
Systems crafted a merger with a company, Sensory
Computing, that had developed sophisticated online
learning capabilities. Sensory contributed a number of
ideas – and key personnel, including Brian F.X.
Murphy, who came on board as president. The two teams
clicked, Sparta
recalls. “It was a wonderful merger. It was the best
merger ever.”
The
combined company pooled talents to re-think the concept
of knowledge readiness and how enterprises might
approach it. By 1999, Plateau Systems had developed a
product that resonated with blue-chip clients like
Motorola, Bristol-Myers Squibb and the U.S. Air Force.
The real-world business model and financial projections didn’t appeal to
most venture
capitalists, but Plateau did find expansion capital in
late 2000, first from General Electric’s private
equity group, and then AIG and Euclid SR Partners.
After
several years of rapid growth, Sparta
now
wants to push the company in two new directions. First,
he wants to widen the company’s product suite,
following the logical evolution of the software. One of
several planned extensions would cover “performance management,” helping
organizations and employees set goals and objectives for improvement;
a related extension would help supervisors with
administering
performance evaluations and intelligently scheduling
their workforce.
The
other initiative is to expand outside the U.S.
“We didn’t go overseas before those markets were
ready,” notes
Sparta. But
the market now appears to be receptive to learning
management systems. Plateau Systems already has a track
record setting up a global LMS for General Electric –
in 11 languages. Sparta
expects more U.S.-based multinationals to follow, and
aims to sign up foreign clients as well.
While
most signs are positive, Sparta
does
have worries. There are just too darn many competitors
in the LMS market. Confident that Plateau can survive a
shake-out, he’d like to see some of the marginal
players drop out. “But they’ve raised so much
cash,” he grouses, “they can go on losing quarter
after quarter after quarter. It’s a challenge -- and
very irritating.”
Also,
the global economic picture – “the times we live
in” – make him nervous, Sparta
says. The conflict with terrorists can whipsaw oil
prices, business confidence and even the technology
market. Large businesses don’t like making large,
strategic investments – Plateau’s average deal size
is about $500,000 – in the face of so much
uncertainty. “I’d like to see some more global and
economic stability so the economy can do its thing.”
But
in the final analysis, Sparta
says, he’s confident that Plateau has a great future.
As corporations
realize that their competitive advantage
lies in the skills and knowledge of their employees,
they will seek to manage their human resources with the
same intensity they manage their financial resources. And
no one is better positioned to help them, he says, than
Plateau Systems.
-- September 8, 2004
|
|
|